Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting, February 4 to 6, 2026 [Under Section 45ZL of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934]
    US trade deal has become an ordeal: Congress slams PM Modi
    Nothing changes, India will be paying tariffs; we will not be paying tariffs: Trump after SC ruling
    Trump seethes over Supreme Court justices who opposed him on tariffs, especially those he appointed
    The Latest: Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff
    Which Trump tariffs did Supreme Court strike down? Here's what to know
    The Latest: Trump addresses press after Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs
    No change in trade deal with India; it is on: Trump after SC verdict
    Trump says he used tariffs to end war between India, Pakistan as he lashes out at US Supreme Court verdict
    Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff after US Supreme Court defeat,
    Trump says he's 'absolutely ashamed' of US Supreme Court justices who issued 'deeply disappointing'  tariff decision
    Congress slams govt for agreeing to trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
    Refunds may be available on some tariffs applied to goods from India: US Chamber of Commerce after SC ruling
    What to know about the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs
    Trump's made tariffs central to his presidency, chaos may come next
    The Supreme Court struck down some of Trump's most sweeping tariffs; Which levies are impacted?
    'Walking away' from recent deals does not seem to be in cards for America's partners: Ex-trade official
    Exporters hail US Supreme Court's decision on Trump tariff
    Trump has other tariff options after Supreme Court strikes down his worldwide import taxes
    SC ruling on Trump's tariffs: Judge refers to tariffs imposed on India for buying Russian oil in dissenting note
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

News
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Policy repo rate unchanged; MPC retains neutral stance as inflation stays benign while growth outlook strengthens.
Under Section 45ZL the MPC's minutes record a unanimous decision to keep the policy repo rate unchanged and to retain the neutral stance after reviewing staff projections, surveys and alternative risk scenarios. The committee judged growth prospects to have strengthened while headline inflation remains benign though modestly revised upward for near quarters due mainly to precious metals; risks to the outlook are broadly balanced and policy will be guided by incoming data and the progress of transmission.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Constitutional limits on presidential tariff power overturned global tariffs, reshaping the interim India-US trade deal consequences.
The US Supreme Court invalidated the President's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress; the decision undercuts executive unilateral tariff measures. The India-US interim agreement saw an Executive Order lifting prior punitive tariffs in return for India's energy purchasing commitments, and a reduced reciprocal tariff rate was agreed. Indian political opposition alleges the deal's timing reflected executive haste that risked sovereign bargaining leverage and domestic agricultural interests.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority curtailed; temporary global import duty imposed to rebalance trade while India trade framework remains intact.
The Supreme Court held that the President exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs; in response the President signed a Proclamation imposing a temporary import duty to address international payments problems and rebalance trade relationships, effective on a specified date for a limited period. The President stated that an interim trade framework with India remains in place, removing certain punitive tariffs on India under an Executive Order while asserting India will assume tariff obligations under the bilateral arrangement.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers tariffs invalidation prompts presidential denunciation of justices and raises separation of powers and institutional independence debate.
Six justices invalidated presidential global tariffs imposed under an asserted emergency powers statute, framing the central legal question as the permissible scope of executive authority to impose trade restrictions without clear congressional authorization, and the litigation tested statutory delegation, administrative action in the trade context, and judicial review of national-security framed economic measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency power limits prompt alternative executive tariff action, raising concerns about agriculture costs and trade uncertainty.
The Supreme Court invalidated a presidential tariff framework as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, leading the president to announce use of alternative executive authority to impose a temporary global tariff. Stakeholders warned that further tariff actions or use of other authorities would increase agricultural input costs and create trade uncertainty, while business groups said ties with trade partners remain intact despite the disruption.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers curtailed as court invalidates broad tariffs imposed under IEEPA, overturning central global levies.
The Supreme Court found the President exceeded authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by using IEEPA to impose broad tariffs, invalidating core IEEPA-based measures including the Liberation Day global tariff framework and subsequent trafficking and country-specific levies on Canada, Mexico, China, Brazil and India; sectoral and non-IEEPA tariffs remain in place while the executive considers alternative measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Executive emergency tariff authority limited, prompting administration to pursue alternative statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Constitution vests the taxing power in Congress and that the emergency statute invoked by the Executive does not authorize imposition of tariffs as revenue measures, constraining executive emergency tariff authority; the administration plans to rely on alternative statutory bases to replace the invalidated tariffs.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff policy remains central as the India trade arrangement continues despite judicial limits on tariff authority.
President Trump stated the bilateral trade arrangement with India remains in effect after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad tariffs, noting an Executive Order rescinded punitive tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia and an Interim Agreement framework reduces reciprocal U.S. tariff treatment toward India while maintaining tariffs on Indian imports under the new terms; he framed tariffs as leverage for energy-sourcing commitments and de-escalation between India and Pakistan.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority rejected, limiting tariff powers while administration decries the decision and cites geopolitical effects.
The Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize imposition of duties, constraining executive authority to impose tariffs under national emergencies; the President criticized the ruling and reiterated that tariffs were used as a foreign policy tool to end hostilities between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by India which attributes cessation to direct military talks.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Global tariff authority challenged after court invalidated emergency-use tariffs; president plans executive-order, time-limited alternative.
A judicial body invalidated a broad presidential program of global tariffs as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, eliminating the administration's primary emergency-based mechanism for imposing unilateral worldwide duties. The president announced intent to use an alternative statutory authority via executive order that would impose time-limited tariffs restricted to 150 days, signaling a shift to a different administrative vehicle for trade measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers invalidation limits executive authority to impose unilateral tariffs, nullifying sweeping reciprocal import duties.
The executive's imposition of sweeping "reciprocal" import duties under a claimed emergency powers statute was found unlawful; the tariffs were invalidated because setting import duties required clear congressional authorization rather than unilateral emergency proclamations, signaling a legal limit on executive authority to alter statutory tariff schemes by emergency declaration.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Judicial review of emergency tariff powers restores congressional tariff authority, affecting recently announced India-US trade concessions.
The US Supreme Court struck down President Trump's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress, thereby removing the legal basis for those sweeping reciprocal tariffs. Indian opposition leaders contend that a recently announced India-US trade framework contained concessions extracted while the tariffs were assumed valid, and they seek clarity on whether those commitments-covering tariff eliminations, import targets, energy sourcing, and non tariff barrier commitments-will persist or be revisited following the judgment.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority invalidated - certain IEEPA based tariffs now refundable to importers who directly paid them.
IEEPA based tariffs were deemed impermissible, allowing refunds only to US importers of record or consignees who directly paid tariffs. Eligible tariffs include IEEPA imposed levies commonly termed fentanyl, trafficking, reciprocal or baseline tariffs, including certain tariffs on goods from Brazil and India. Refunds exclude duties imposed under other statutory authorities such as anti dumping, countervailing, trade remedy or national security provisions. The administrative procedure and timing for claims remain uncertain pending further court and executive guidance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers limited: IEEPA cannot be used to impose broad import tariffs, leaving refund questions open.
The Supreme Court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to impose broad import tariffs, stressing that authority to levy taxes and tariffs rests with Congress and that longstanding practice shows such power has not been exercised under IEEPA. The opinion invalidates tariffs enacted under emergency proclamations while leaving untouched tariffs based on other statutory grounds, and it leaves unresolved whether and how refunds should be returned to importers who paid the challenged levies.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency tariff power invalidated, forcing alternative legal routes and prolonging trade and political uncertainty.
The Court held the president lacked authority to declare an economic emergency and impose sweeping import tariffs, removing an executive legal basis for those tariffs and forcing the administration to pursue alternative statutory mechanisms, which will prolong legal and political debate over trade policy.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority curtailed: major emergency based tariffs invalidated, leaving sectoral trade measures and exemptions intact.
The President exceeded statutory authority by invoking IEEPA to impose broad import tariffs, nullifying core emergency based levies. Affected measures include the wide ranging "Liberation Day" tariffs, trafficking justified duties on Canada, Mexico and China, Brazil linked duties, and India related levies tied to Russian oil purchases. The decision removes the IEEPA route for economy wide tariffs but leaves intact sectoral and statute specific tools that continue to impose tariffs on selected industries and products.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority struck down; partners unlikely to abandon recent tariff deals, administration to rely on other statutes.
The Supreme Court invalidated reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs, finding IEEPA does not authorize such duties. Observers anticipate the Administration will instead invoke clear congressional tariff statutes and that trading partners who made recent deals are unlikely to withdraw them, having expected alternative statutory mechanisms to keep tariffs in place.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency-powers tariff invalidation restores trade predictability for exporters, but sectoral steel and aluminium duties remain in force.
The US Supreme Court invalidated country-specific reciprocal tariffs imposed under emergency powers, restoring predictability for exporters and enabling importers to seek refunds for duties paid under the invalidated regime, while separate sector-specific duties on steel, aluminium and certain auto components remain in force.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff authority options: multiple statutory pathways remain for imposing import duties despite limits on emergency powers.
After the court rejected the administration's emergency-based authority for sweeping reciprocal tariffs, the president can still impose import duties using alternative statutes: the Trade Act unfair-practices authority permitting unlimited tariffs after investigation and hearings; the Trade Act provision for addressing unbalanced trade that allows time-limited tariffs without prior investigation but is untested; the national-security tariff authority under the Trade Expansion Act which requires Commerce investigations; and a rarely used Tariff Act depression-era authorisation that allows very high, indefinite tariffs without investigation.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority questioned as tariffs ruled unauthorized; dissent stresses tariffs' foreign affairs leverage, including India example.
The decision holds that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the imposition of import duties, rejecting the use of IEEPA as a statutory basis for tariffs; a dissent argued such tariffs fall within foreign affairs practice, serve as leverage in international negotiations, and cautioned against applying a major questions constraint to executive statutory authority in national security and diplomatic contexts.

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Customs & Trade

Market Trends Indicate a Turning Point for Bitcoin Mining Hardware in India

February 23, 2026

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

In the last few years, the concept of a cryptocurrency miner India was mainly restricted to a select group of enthusiasts and early adopters. The situation is evolving as more investors, technologists as well as small-scale businesses are exploring the possibility of bitcoin mining india as part of a wider plan for digital assets. However the market data indicates that India's part of the mining hardware demands around the world has increased from a low beginning and is one of the fastest-growing segments of Asia. This change is driven by greater connectivity, less expensive hardware per terahash and the gradual transition from experimental installations to more professional power-aware home and data centre deployments.

In India, the Expanding Digital Infrastructure The digital infrastructure of India has grown rapidly, with data centers as well as fiber networks and cloud platforms growing across the major cities as well as the developing tech hubs. These upgrades are quietly supporting the crypto mining infrastructure in India due to the fact that solid connectivity and steady power are essential for any serious mining venture.

Private data-centres and government-backed constructions are also tied to larger infrastructure investments in India specifically in connectivity and power. As AI 5G, AI and cloud-based workloads increase and demand for planning, the planners have to consider the demand for power infrastructure and indirectly benefit miners who are able to occupy machines in modern locations where power quality and uptime are better than typical homes.

Are Bitcoin mining operations increasing in India? Yes. Although India is still a tiny percentage of global hashrate mining hardware revenue, mining hardware sales from the nation are increasing by double digits and India is expected to be among the fastest-growing markets for mining hardware in Asia in the coming years. It is not just confined to large farms. It can also be found in smaller powerful rigs, which are located in offices, homes and co-location racks.

Growing Demand for ASIC Mining Hardware As margins are tightening across the globe mining companies are becoming more cautious about their equipment and that is pushing Indian buyers to ASIC mining hardware instead of general-purpose GPUs. Analysts predict that the India bitcoin mining market is likely to nearly double in the period between 2023- 2030 with the bulk of this expansion tied to Bitcoin-focused equipment.

In this environment, India crypto hardware demand is shifting away from pure hashrate to reliability, efficiency as well as after-sales assistance. Buyers who are looking to buy bitcoin mining equipment india are now comparing joules-per-terahash warranties, and repairs in the local area, and not just price per unit, which is an indication of a market that is maturing.

What is the reason for ASIC hardware demand rising? ASICs provide a higher number of hashes per Watt than GPUs, and that is important in a nation where power prices could quickly wipe out thin mining margins. As newer generation chips boost efficiency and competition in the global market reduces the price per terahash unit, increasing the number of Indian mining companies are looking at ASICs as their only option to remain profitable through many difficulties.

Shift from GPU To ASIC Systems In the past there were a lot of small Indian establishments that relied on gaming cards due to their being easily sourced and sold. The window for this is closing now that competitiveness and network difficulties make older GPU equipment unaffordable for Bitcoin especially when you consider the noise and cooling in urban environments with lots of noise.

Even a small bitcoin miner that is built around an advanced ASIC will provide much greater performance and a better payback rate than a room filled with older GPUs. However, this doesn't necessarily mean GPUs disappear completely; however, specifically for Bitcoin in particular, their use is diminishing in the same way that ASICs are becoming the preferred option.

Supply Chain and Participation in the Domestic Market Globally the supply chain remains centered around a few manufacturers and suppliers, however India's position as a major electronic and semiconductor buyer is changing the way integrators and distributors are serving their local customers. The reports regarding the ASIC hardware market in India have shown an increase in imports of semi-custom and customized chips, and a growing interest of Indian design firms in providing ASIC designing and manufacturing solutions for specialized tasks, such as mining.

These trends don't mean India is going to suddenly produce cutting-edge mining chips, however, they do suggest greater local involvement in testing, logistics hosting, and the integration of mining equipment imported from abroad. This ecosystem supports makes it simpler for newcomers to use hardware without starting from scratch.

Snapshot Forces Shaping India's Mining Hardware A Turning Point Regulation, Electricity and Sustainability Growing demand for mining electricity in India is among the primary reasons that large-scale industrial farms are prone to disruption particularly in states with grid limitations or rely extensively on coal. Mining companies are moving to areas that offer better rates as well as solar-powered hybrid systems that decrease the dependence on grids over time.

On the political side and on the policy side, regulation of crypto mining India is in the process of evolving. Mining itself is not banned, but it sits inside broader tax, anti-money-laundering, and exchange-control frameworks rather than under a dedicated mining law. The ongoing discussions on regulatory clarity India crypto center on disclosures, flows across borders, and environmental reporting. These discussions may eventually be formalized to codify the best practices, rather than closing the doors to mining completely.

Is cryptocurrency mining allowed in India? As of the date of writing this article, the operation of mining equipment isn't explicitly prohibited in India However, miners must adhere to the tax laws, KYC requirements when converting currencies to fiat and any new disclosure requirements which regulators will introduce. Because the landscape is ever-changing and changing, many operators maintain their profile low and favor transparent accounting in order to minimize future risks of compliance.

What impact does mining have on the use of electricity? Mining is a constant and high-uptime burden on local grids. This can increase the cost of electricity and strain on peak-time systems if equipment isn't working properly or poorly cooling. If miners combine with efficient ASICs with off-peak energy usage or renewable energy sources, they are able to lower costs and reduce environmental impact as compared to older, energy-hungry rigs.

What Does This Mean for the future of Crypto Mining in India When you put these pieces together, India is shifting from a sporadic hobby community to an organized bitcoin mining industry India which is determined by efficiency measures as well as infrastructure quality and policies rather than speculation by itself. The majority of buyers view hardware as a capital investment for the long term that has to be in line with local tariffs, regulations and hosting rules.

If you're planning to be a crypto miner in India or to upgrade the current setup, this turning point will mean more research, but also improved tools. Platforms such as miningnow.com allow you to plug in hashrates, power consumption and tariffs to calculate real-time returns before committing equipment to a particular website. Bharat Miners is frequently cited by Indian miners as a reliable source of information in comparing models and understanding the impact of global trends on India's market place for high-end ASIC equipment in India. As the landscape develops those who can combine precise profit calculations with most suitable bitcoin miner selections will likely be the ones who are still operating smoothly throughout the next cycle.

(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with NRDPL and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI PWR

Topics

Acts Income Tax