Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    MoSPI to Convene National Level Consultative Workshop on "Using Administrative Data for Governance: Harmonizing Departmental Data at State Level" on 2...
    Congress claims US trade deal has become an 'ordeal', Rahul says 'PM compromised'
    Murky outlook for businesses after tariff ruling prompts countermoves by Trump
    Indian-origin lawyer at centre of landmark Supreme Court verdict against Trump
    Supreme Court struck down Trump's tariffs. Now comes hard work of issuing refunds
    Perfios Launches 'KScan AI': Empowers BFSI with AI-powered Business Intelligence and Risk Assessment of 30 Million Indian MSMEs
    Indian goods face only 10 pc reciprocal levy in US after court ruling, new order: Exporters
    Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee Meeting, February 4 to 6, 2026 [Under Section 45ZL of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934]
    US trade deal has become an ordeal: Congress slams PM Modi
    Nothing changes, India will be paying tariffs; we will not be paying tariffs: Trump after SC ruling
    Trump seethes over Supreme Court justices who opposed him on tariffs, especially those he appointed
    The Latest: Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff
    Which Trump tariffs did Supreme Court strike down? Here's what to know
    The Latest: Trump addresses press after Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs
    No change in trade deal with India; it is on: Trump after SC verdict
    Trump says he used tariffs to end war between India, Pakistan as he lashes out at US Supreme Court verdict
    Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff after US Supreme Court defeat,
    Trump says he's 'absolutely ashamed' of US Supreme Court justices who issued 'deeply disappointing'  tariff decision
    Congress slams govt for agreeing to trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
    Refunds may be available on some tariffs applied to goods from India: US Chamber of Commerce after SC ruling
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

News
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Administrative data harmonization to inform a national agenda and prepare states for coordinated governance reforms.
The Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation is convening a national consultative workshop on using administrative data for governance to brief States/UTs, Central ministries and other stakeholders on objectives, scope and key issues, as a preparatory step for a national summit. The workshop will gather expert deliberations, showcase use cases, and collate inputs from State level workshops to identify priority reform areas for strengthening administrative data systems and enabling responsible harmonization across departments.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority reversed, trade deal's tariff basis challenged; India-US agreement's viability questioned, prompting political backlash domestically.
Following a judicial curtailment of presidential power to impose global tariffs under emergency authority, the US administration invoked an alternative statute to impose a temporary import surcharge to preserve an existing India-US interim trade framework; this shift alters the tariff basis of the deal and raises questions about the surcharge's applicability to India and the deal's implications for market access, subsidy withdrawal, agricultural protections, energy security, and data safeguards.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority limited by court; administration seeks alternative statutory paths to maintain import duties, prolonging business uncertainty.
The Supreme Court ruled the president lacked authority under the emergency-powers framework to impose import tariffs, voiding tariffs imposed on that basis while leaving open the administration's use of other statutory authorities to impose duties; the decision narrows one executive route for tariffs but creates complex refund and recovery issues and leaves many existing tariffs under different authorities intact.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Separation of powers affirmed: Presidential global tariffs invalidated, reaffirming that only Congress may impose taxes.
A Supreme Court decision concluded that broad presidential global tariffs exceeded executive authority by encroaching on Congress's exclusive power over taxation; counsel for small businesses argued the levies operated as taxes imposed without congressional authorization, framing the dispute as a structural separation of powers issue and reaffirming that only Congress can impose taxes.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Invalidation of emergency tariff authority leaves collected import duties subject to refund and protracted litigation.
The Supreme Court held the International Emergency Economic Powers Act did not authorize presidential tariffs, leaving collected import duties unlawful but not prescribing a refund mechanism. Administration of refunds will likely involve the customs agency, specialised trade tribunals and lower courts, utilising or adapting existing duty correction procedures, and is expected to produce prolonged, multi jurisdictional litigation as importers seek recovery while consumers face evidentiary obstacles to claiming pass through losses.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
KYC/KYB compliance automation expands: AI platform streamlines MSME due diligence, risk screening and faster onboarding for lenders.
An AI-powered KYC/KYB platform automates entity and individual due diligence and compliance for the BFSI sector, centralising MSME discovery and risk evaluation via a large multi-source data lake. It supports onboarding, underwriting, GTM optimisation and credit decisioning by converting fragmented business information into actionable intelligence. The system enables scaled lead generation, automated due diligence, and extensive sanction and litigation screening to bolster anti-money laundering controls, and provides a Model Context Protocol allowing configurable AI agents and custom model integration to align with institutional policies.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Temporary import surcharge lowers reciprocal US tariff on Indian goods following legal limitation on presidential tariff powers
A presidential proclamation imposes a temporary import surcharge of ten per cent ad valorem, effective February 24, 2026, applied in addition to existing Most Favoured Nation duties; this replaces prior broader reciprocal levies on Indian goods, while higher sectoral tariffs for specified products remain and the surcharge applies only to a portion of exports due to coverage exemptions.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Policy repo rate unchanged; MPC retains neutral stance as inflation stays benign while growth outlook strengthens.
Under Section 45ZL the MPC's minutes record a unanimous decision to keep the policy repo rate unchanged and to retain the neutral stance after reviewing staff projections, surveys and alternative risk scenarios. The committee judged growth prospects to have strengthened while headline inflation remains benign though modestly revised upward for near quarters due mainly to precious metals; risks to the outlook are broadly balanced and policy will be guided by incoming data and the progress of transmission.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Constitutional limits on presidential tariff power overturned global tariffs, reshaping the interim India-US trade deal consequences.
The US Supreme Court invalidated the President's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress; the decision undercuts executive unilateral tariff measures. The India-US interim agreement saw an Executive Order lifting prior punitive tariffs in return for India's energy purchasing commitments, and a reduced reciprocal tariff rate was agreed. Indian political opposition alleges the deal's timing reflected executive haste that risked sovereign bargaining leverage and domestic agricultural interests.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential tariff authority curtailed; temporary global import duty imposed to rebalance trade while India trade framework remains intact.
The Supreme Court held that the President exceeded authority in imposing sweeping tariffs; in response the President signed a Proclamation imposing a temporary import duty to address international payments problems and rebalance trade relationships, effective on a specified date for a limited period. The President stated that an interim trade framework with India remains in place, removing certain punitive tariffs on India under an Executive Order while asserting India will assume tariff obligations under the bilateral arrangement.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers tariffs invalidation prompts presidential denunciation of justices and raises separation of powers and institutional independence debate.
Six justices invalidated presidential global tariffs imposed under an asserted emergency powers statute, framing the central legal question as the permissible scope of executive authority to impose trade restrictions without clear congressional authorization, and the litigation tested statutory delegation, administrative action in the trade context, and judicial review of national-security framed economic measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency power limits prompt alternative executive tariff action, raising concerns about agriculture costs and trade uncertainty.
The Supreme Court invalidated a presidential tariff framework as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, leading the president to announce use of alternative executive authority to impose a temporary global tariff. Stakeholders warned that further tariff actions or use of other authorities would increase agricultural input costs and create trade uncertainty, while business groups said ties with trade partners remain intact despite the disruption.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers curtailed as court invalidates broad tariffs imposed under IEEPA, overturning central global levies.
The Supreme Court found the President exceeded authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by using IEEPA to impose broad tariffs, invalidating core IEEPA-based measures including the Liberation Day global tariff framework and subsequent trafficking and country-specific levies on Canada, Mexico, China, Brazil and India; sectoral and non-IEEPA tariffs remain in place while the executive considers alternative measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Executive emergency tariff authority limited, prompting administration to pursue alternative statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Constitution vests the taxing power in Congress and that the emergency statute invoked by the Executive does not authorize imposition of tariffs as revenue measures, constraining executive emergency tariff authority; the administration plans to rely on alternative statutory bases to replace the invalidated tariffs.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff policy remains central as the India trade arrangement continues despite judicial limits on tariff authority.
President Trump stated the bilateral trade arrangement with India remains in effect after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad tariffs, noting an Executive Order rescinded punitive tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia and an Interim Agreement framework reduces reciprocal U.S. tariff treatment toward India while maintaining tariffs on Indian imports under the new terms; he framed tariffs as leverage for energy-sourcing commitments and de-escalation between India and Pakistan.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority rejected, limiting tariff powers while administration decries the decision and cites geopolitical effects.
The Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize imposition of duties, constraining executive authority to impose tariffs under national emergencies; the President criticized the ruling and reiterated that tariffs were used as a foreign policy tool to end hostilities between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by India which attributes cessation to direct military talks.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Global tariff authority challenged after court invalidated emergency-use tariffs; president plans executive-order, time-limited alternative.
A judicial body invalidated a broad presidential program of global tariffs as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, eliminating the administration's primary emergency-based mechanism for imposing unilateral worldwide duties. The president announced intent to use an alternative statutory authority via executive order that would impose time-limited tariffs restricted to 150 days, signaling a shift to a different administrative vehicle for trade measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers invalidation limits executive authority to impose unilateral tariffs, nullifying sweeping reciprocal import duties.
The executive's imposition of sweeping "reciprocal" import duties under a claimed emergency powers statute was found unlawful; the tariffs were invalidated because setting import duties required clear congressional authorization rather than unilateral emergency proclamations, signaling a legal limit on executive authority to alter statutory tariff schemes by emergency declaration.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Judicial review of emergency tariff powers restores congressional tariff authority, affecting recently announced India-US trade concessions.
The US Supreme Court struck down President Trump's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress, thereby removing the legal basis for those sweeping reciprocal tariffs. Indian opposition leaders contend that a recently announced India-US trade framework contained concessions extracted while the tariffs were assumed valid, and they seek clarity on whether those commitments-covering tariff eliminations, import targets, energy sourcing, and non tariff barrier commitments-will persist or be revisited following the judgment.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority invalidated - certain IEEPA based tariffs now refundable to importers who directly paid them.
IEEPA based tariffs were deemed impermissible, allowing refunds only to US importers of record or consignees who directly paid tariffs. Eligible tariffs include IEEPA imposed levies commonly termed fentanyl, trafficking, reciprocal or baseline tariffs, including certain tariffs on goods from Brazil and India. Refunds exclude duties imposed under other statutory authorities such as anti dumping, countervailing, trade remedy or national security provisions. The administrative procedure and timing for claims remain uncertain pending further court and executive guidance.

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

News

Showing Results for : Reset Filters
Corp. Laws / SEBI / IBC

Why SEBI Registered Investment Advisory Is Becoming a Non-Negotiable for Smart Investors

February 23, 2026

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

New Delhi [India], February 20: As India’s equity markets continue to attract a growing number of retail investors, the way people seek investment guidance is also changing. From social media stock tips to paid Telegram groups, advice is everywhere. Yet, alongside this explosion of information, cases of misinformation, fraud, and mis-selling have also increased. In this environment, choosing a sebi registered investment advisory is no longer just a preference. For many informed investors, working with a sebi registered advisory has become a basic requirement for protecting capital and maintaining long-term financial discipline. The shift from excitement to safety Earlier, many investors were driven by excitement. Fast gains, trending stocks, and viral success stories shaped decisions. Over time, reality has set in. Markets are volatile, and emotional decisions often lead to losses. Investors are now prioritising safety, structure, and accountability over speed.

This shift has made regulation central to the advisory selection process. Smart investors are realising that who advises them matters as much as what they invest in.

The growing problem of unregulated advice Unregulated advice is one of the biggest risks in today’s market. Anyone with a social media account can present themselves as a market expert. There are no entry barriers, no qualification requirements, and no accountability.

Such advisors often operate on hype. They highlight profits, ignore losses, and disappear when things go wrong. Investors dealing with unregulated advisors have little to no recourse when disputes arise. This lack of protection has pushed investors to look for regulated alternatives.

Why regulation changes the advisor’s role Regulation fundamentally changes how an advisor operates. A registered advisor functions under a defined legal and ethical framework set by Securities and Exchange Board of India. This framework is designed to protect investors, not to maximise sales or popularity.

A regulated advisor is required to meet qualification standards, maintain records, follow strict communication rules, and act in the client’s best interest. These obligations reduce the scope for manipulation and unethical behaviour.

Fiduciary responsibility builds trust One of the strongest reasons smart investors insist on registered advisors is fiduciary responsibility. A fiduciary is legally bound to prioritise the client’s interest above their own.

This means advice cannot be influenced by hidden commissions, personal holdings, or external incentives. For investors, this creates confidence that recommendations are made for suitability and long-term benefit, not short-term gain.

Transparency removes uncertainty Smart investors value clarity. Registered advisors are required to be transparent about fees, risks, and limitations of strategies. There are no vague promises or ambiguous structures.

This transparency helps investors set realistic expectations. When investors understand what can go wrong, they are less likely to panic during market downturns. Transparency replaces fear with preparedness.

No room for guaranteed returns Guaranteed returns are one of the biggest red flags in investing. Markets do not offer certainty, especially in equities. Registered advisors are prohibited from promising assured profits.

This restriction may seem limiting, but it actually protects investors. It ensures advice is grounded in reality, focusing on probability, risk management, and long-term planning rather than unrealistic claims.

Suitability over mass recommendations Unregulated advisors often push the same ideas to thousands of investors. Registered advisors, however, are required to assess suitability before giving advice.

Suitability involves understanding income stability, financial obligations, investment horizon, and risk tolerance. This personalised approach ensures investors are not exposed to risks they cannot handle. Smart investors understand that personalised advice is more valuable than popular tips.

Accountability through documentation Another reason registered advisory is becoming non-negotiable is accountability. Advice must be documented and supported by reasoning. This creates an audit trail that can be reviewed if disputes arise.

Documentation encourages discipline. Advisors think carefully before making recommendations, and investors gain clarity on why decisions were made. This shared responsibility strengthens the advisory relationship.

Strong grievance redressal mechanisms When problems occur with unregulated advisors, investors are often left helpless. Phone numbers change, websites vanish, and communication stops.

With registered advisors, formal grievance mechanisms exist. Investors can escalate issues through recognised channels. The presence of oversight acts as a deterrent against unethical practices and reassures investors that they are not alone.

Education over dependency Smart investors are increasingly valuing education. Registered advisors focus on helping investors understand market behaviour, risk, and long-term planning.

This approach reduces dependency on tips and alerts. Educated investors make better decisions and remain calmer during volatility. Over time, this mindset contributes more to wealth creation than chasing short-term opportunities.

Long-term discipline in volatile markets Markets will always experience cycles of optimism and fear. What separates successful investors from the rest is discipline. Registered advisors emphasise process, asset allocation, and patience.

Instead of reacting to every headline, investors follow a structured plan. This discipline protects portfolios during downturns and allows investors to benefit from long-term growth.

Conclusion In a market flooded with noise, opinions, and unverified claims, regulation has emerged as a crucial filter. Smart investors are recognising that protection, transparency, and accountability matter more than flashy promises.

Choosing a SEBI registered investment advisory is no longer about compliance alone. It is about safeguarding capital, reducing emotional mistakes, and building a sustainable investment journey. As awareness grows, registered advisory is steadily becoming a non-negotiable standard for investors who value clarity, confidence, and long-term financial well-being.

(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with PNN and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI PWR

Topics

Acts Income Tax