Loading...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 News - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Category: ?
Categorized by AI
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Income Tax
  • GST
  • Customs, DGFT & SEZ
  • FEMA & RBI
  • Corp. Laws, SEBI & IBC
  • PMLA, Black Money & ED
  • Budget
  • News and Press Release
  • PTI News
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    The Latest: Trump addresses press after Supreme Court strikes down his sweeping tariffs
    No change in trade deal with India; it is on: Trump after SC verdict
    Trump says he used tariffs to end war between India, Pakistan as he lashes out at US Supreme Court verdict
    Trump says he'll sign executive order to enact 10 per cent global tariff after US Supreme Court defeat,
    Trump says he's 'absolutely ashamed' of US Supreme Court justices who issued 'deeply disappointing'  tariff decision
    Congress slams govt for agreeing to trade deal after US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs
    Refunds may be available on some tariffs applied to goods from India: US Chamber of Commerce after SC ruling
    What to know about the Supreme Court ruling on tariffs
    Trump's made tariffs central to his presidency, chaos may come next
    The Supreme Court struck down some of Trump's most sweeping tariffs; Which levies are impacted?
    'Walking away' from recent deals does not seem to be in cards for America's partners: Ex-trade official
    Exporters hail US Supreme Court's decision on Trump tariff
    Trump has other tariff options after Supreme Court strikes down his worldwide import taxes
    SC ruling on Trump's tariffs: Judge refers to tariffs imposed on India for buying Russian oil in dissenting note
    EU, US trade deals to boost Indian economy; growth resilient: RBI bulletin
    Supreme Court strikes down Trump's sweeping tariffs, upending central plank of economic agenda
    India’s macroeconomic fundamentals healthy, robust amid volatile financial markets: RBI guv
    Former Jaypee Infratech MD Manoj Gaur surrenders in Delhi's Tihar Jail
    Current policy rate appropriate amid buoyant eco growth, benign inflation: RBI Guv
    FTAs to play significant role in coming years by improving market access: RBI bulletin
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

News
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Executive emergency tariff authority limited, prompting administration to pursue alternative statutory bases for imposing tariffs.
The Supreme Court concluded that the Constitution vests the taxing power in Congress and that the emergency statute invoked by the Executive does not authorize imposition of tariffs as revenue measures, constraining executive emergency tariff authority; the administration plans to rely on alternative statutory bases to replace the invalidated tariffs.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff policy remains central as the India trade arrangement continues despite judicial limits on tariff authority.
President Trump stated the bilateral trade arrangement with India remains in effect after the Supreme Court invalidated his broad tariffs, noting an Executive Order rescinded punitive tariffs on Indian oil imports from Russia and an Interim Agreement framework reduces reciprocal U.S. tariff treatment toward India while maintaining tariffs on Indian imports under the new terms; he framed tariffs as leverage for energy-sourcing commitments and de-escalation between India and Pakistan.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority rejected, limiting tariff powers while administration decries the decision and cites geopolitical effects.
The Supreme Court held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize imposition of duties, constraining executive authority to impose tariffs under national emergencies; the President criticized the ruling and reiterated that tariffs were used as a foreign policy tool to end hostilities between India and Pakistan, a claim denied by India which attributes cessation to direct military talks.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Global tariff authority challenged after court invalidated emergency-use tariffs; president plans executive-order, time-limited alternative.
A judicial body invalidated a broad presidential program of global tariffs as an unlawful exercise of emergency power, eliminating the administration's primary emergency-based mechanism for imposing unilateral worldwide duties. The president announced intent to use an alternative statutory authority via executive order that would impose time-limited tariffs restricted to 150 days, signaling a shift to a different administrative vehicle for trade measures.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers invalidation limits executive authority to impose unilateral tariffs, nullifying sweeping reciprocal import duties.
The executive's imposition of sweeping "reciprocal" import duties under a claimed emergency powers statute was found unlawful; the tariffs were invalidated because setting import duties required clear congressional authorization rather than unilateral emergency proclamations, signaling a legal limit on executive authority to alter statutory tariff schemes by emergency declaration.
February 21, 2026
Show AI Summary
Judicial review of emergency tariff powers restores congressional tariff authority, affecting recently announced India-US trade concessions.
The US Supreme Court struck down President Trump's global tariffs imposed under emergency powers, finding tariff authority lies with Congress, thereby removing the legal basis for those sweeping reciprocal tariffs. Indian opposition leaders contend that a recently announced India-US trade framework contained concessions extracted while the tariffs were assumed valid, and they seek clarity on whether those commitments-covering tariff eliminations, import targets, energy sourcing, and non tariff barrier commitments-will persist or be revisited following the judgment.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority invalidated - certain IEEPA based tariffs now refundable to importers who directly paid them.
IEEPA based tariffs were deemed impermissible, allowing refunds only to US importers of record or consignees who directly paid tariffs. Eligible tariffs include IEEPA imposed levies commonly termed fentanyl, trafficking, reciprocal or baseline tariffs, including certain tariffs on goods from Brazil and India. Refunds exclude duties imposed under other statutory authorities such as anti dumping, countervailing, trade remedy or national security provisions. The administrative procedure and timing for claims remain uncertain pending further court and executive guidance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency powers limited: IEEPA cannot be used to impose broad import tariffs, leaving refund questions open.
The Supreme Court concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to impose broad import tariffs, stressing that authority to levy taxes and tariffs rests with Congress and that longstanding practice shows such power has not been exercised under IEEPA. The opinion invalidates tariffs enacted under emergency proclamations while leaving untouched tariffs based on other statutory grounds, and it leaves unresolved whether and how refunds should be returned to importers who paid the challenged levies.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Presidential emergency tariff power invalidated, forcing alternative legal routes and prolonging trade and political uncertainty.
The Court held the president lacked authority to declare an economic emergency and impose sweeping import tariffs, removing an executive legal basis for those tariffs and forcing the administration to pursue alternative statutory mechanisms, which will prolong legal and political debate over trade policy.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority curtailed: major emergency based tariffs invalidated, leaving sectoral trade measures and exemptions intact.
The President exceeded statutory authority by invoking IEEPA to impose broad import tariffs, nullifying core emergency based levies. Affected measures include the wide ranging "Liberation Day" tariffs, trafficking justified duties on Canada, Mexico and China, Brazil linked duties, and India related levies tied to Russian oil purchases. The decision removes the IEEPA route for economy wide tariffs but leaves intact sectoral and statute specific tools that continue to impose tariffs on selected industries and products.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority struck down; partners unlikely to abandon recent tariff deals, administration to rely on other statutes.
The Supreme Court invalidated reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose broad tariffs, finding IEEPA does not authorize such duties. Observers anticipate the Administration will instead invoke clear congressional tariff statutes and that trading partners who made recent deals are unlikely to withdraw them, having expected alternative statutory mechanisms to keep tariffs in place.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency-powers tariff invalidation restores trade predictability for exporters, but sectoral steel and aluminium duties remain in force.
The US Supreme Court invalidated country-specific reciprocal tariffs imposed under emergency powers, restoring predictability for exporters and enabling importers to seek refunds for duties paid under the invalidated regime, while separate sector-specific duties on steel, aluminium and certain auto components remain in force.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Tariff authority options: multiple statutory pathways remain for imposing import duties despite limits on emergency powers.
After the court rejected the administration's emergency-based authority for sweeping reciprocal tariffs, the president can still impose import duties using alternative statutes: the Trade Act unfair-practices authority permitting unlimited tariffs after investigation and hearings; the Trade Act provision for addressing unbalanced trade that allows time-limited tariffs without prior investigation but is untested; the national-security tariff authority under the Trade Expansion Act which requires Commerce investigations; and a rarely used Tariff Act depression-era authorisation that allows very high, indefinite tariffs without investigation.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
IEEPA authority questioned as tariffs ruled unauthorized; dissent stresses tariffs' foreign affairs leverage, including India example.
The decision holds that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the imposition of import duties, rejecting the use of IEEPA as a statutory basis for tariffs; a dissent argued such tariffs fall within foreign affairs practice, serve as leverage in international negotiations, and cautioned against applying a major questions constraint to executive statutory authority in national security and diplomatic contexts.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Trade deals improve market access and spur investor confidence, supporting growth and fiscal consolidation momentum.
Trade agreements with the EU and an interim US deal are expected to improve market access, boost export competitiveness, and reverse investor sentiment with renewed foreign portfolio investment into equity and debt. Fiscal consolidation alongside stepped up capital expenditure aims to crowd in private investment and support state infrastructure. Concurrently, the Reserve Bank recorded consecutive spot market dollar sales amid rupee volatility and capital flow intermittency, while inflation is expected to remain near target, sustaining a favourable near term growth-inflation balance.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Emergency powers limits curb broad presidential tariffs, invalidating sweeping reciprocal trade measures and reshaping trade policy authority.
The Supreme Court found that tariffs enacted under asserted emergency statutory powers-including widely applied reciprocal tariffs-exceeded the President's lawful authority, clarifying statutory limits on unilateral tariff measures and signaling judicial constraints on executive use of emergency powers for sweeping trade regulation.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Repo rate decision maintains neutral monetary stance as growth outlook brightens while inflation risks remain monitored.
The Monetary Policy Committee held the repo rate steady and retained a neutral stance, finding the current policy rate appropriate amid buoyant growth and broadly benign inflation. Members cited healthy medium term macroeconomic fundamentals and improving external outlook driven by trade agreements and fiscal measures, while noting persistent global volatility and risks to inflation. The MPC emphasized ongoing transmission of prior easing, awaited new GDP and inflation data series, and reaffirmed readiness to reassess policy as fresh data emerge.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Money laundering allegations prompt former MD to surrender to custody after interim bail term expires in fraud-linked probe.
Allegations of money laundering and diversion of homebuyer funds form the basis of an ED investigation and FIRs alleging that two group companies misapplied project receipts, leaving residential projects incomplete and purchasers defrauded. The promoter was arrested, obtained interim bail, and later surrendered after a court denied regular bail, the court noting allegations of widespread cheating and criminal breach of trust. A related listed company filed a regulatory update confirming the director's surrender upon expiration of interim bail.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Policy rate maintained as appropriate: neutral monetary stance justified by buoyant growth and benign inflation.
The Monetary Policy Committee voted to maintain the existing policy repo rate and retain a neutral stance, finding the current policy rate appropriate given buoyant growth and benign inflation. The Governor noted healthy medium term macroeconomic fundamentals, while the Deputy Governor cited upward revisions to near term growth projections and incomplete transmission of earlier rate cuts as reasons to defer further easing until new GDP and inflation series data are available.
February 20, 2026
Show AI Summary
Free trade agreements improving market access and export competitiveness, prompting investor confidence and supporting growth policy.
Free trade agreements with the EU and an interim pact with the US are expected to improve market access, enhance export competitiveness, and deepen Indian firms' integration into global value chains; this expectation has altered investor sentiment, prompting a return of foreign portfolio investment, while the Union Budget stresses fiscal consolidation alongside stepped up capital expenditure, and headline inflation remains benign under the revised CPI series.

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

News

Back

All News

Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Rising number of Indian freelancers, digital entrepreneurs forming US companies; compliance risks often overlooked, say experts

February 18, 2026

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

A growing number of Indian freelancers, SaaS founders and digital service providers are registering Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) in the United States to access international payment infrastructure and banking services, but many are unaware of the compliance obligations that follow formation, according to tax professionals and formation service providers. The trend, driven largely by social media marketing and YouTube tutorials, has created an entire services industry catering to Indian entrepreneurs seeking US business entities, with formation packages typically priced between USD 500 and USD 2,000.

According to data from LLCBuddy, which tracks LLC formation requirements and costs across all 50 US states, state filing fees range from USD 40 to USD 500. The states most commonly chosen by non-US residents-Wyoming, Delaware and New Mexico-charge state fees of approximately USD 100, USD 90–110 and USD 50 respectively.

Compliance obligations Tax professionals say the primary risk for Indian-owned US LLCs lies not in formation but in the compliance requirements that follow. Steve Goldstein, founder of US-based LLC formation resource LLCBuddy, said the gap between formation marketing and compliance reality is the central problem facing non-resident LLC owners. "Most founders budget for registration. Very few budget for year two," he said.

Every single-member LLC owned by a non-US person is required to file IRS Form 5472 annually, reporting all transactions between the LLC and its foreign owner. According to IRS instructions revised in December 2024, the penalty for failure to file is USD 25,000 per form. If non-compliance continues beyond 90 days after IRS notification, additional penalties of USD 25,000 apply for each subsequent 30-day period, with no statutory maximum. The form cannot currently be filed electronically and must be submitted by mail or fax to the IRS processing centre in Ogden, Utah.

Tax professionals who work with Indian clients holding US entities say awareness of Form 5472 among small business owners and freelancers remains low, with many learning about the requirement only after receiving IRS notices or consulting a chartered accountant well after formation.

Indian regulatory obligations Beyond US compliance, forming a foreign entity may trigger obligations under the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the Reserve Bank of India’s Overseas Direct Investment (ODI) framework, according to legal professionals.

India taxes its residents on worldwide income. Income earned through a US LLC by an Indian tax resident is generally liable to be reported and taxed in India, irrespective of where the business entity is registered or where the funds are held.

The Income Tax Act, 2025, which received Presidential assent in August 2025 and is set to take effect from April 1, 2026, retains the provision-originally introduced by the Finance Act, 2020-under which Indian citizens with domestic income exceeding Rs 15 lakh who are not tax residents of any other country may be deemed Indian tax residents. This deemed residency provision has been in effect since the 2020–21 assessment year under the existing Income Tax Act, 1961, and will continue under the new Act.

US beneficial ownership reporting exemption In a development that reduces one layer of compliance for US-formed entities, the US Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an interim final rule in March 2025 exempting domestic entities-including LLCs formed in any US state-from Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) reporting requirements under the Corporate Transparency Act. Only entities formed under foreign law and registered in a US state are now required to file BOI reports.

The exemption does not affect the Form 5472 filing requirement, which remains in effect for all foreign-owned single-member LLCs.

Formation services industry The formation services industry has expanded significantly to serve Indian clients. Companies offering LLC registration, Employer Identification Number (EIN) procurement, registered agent services and US bank account assistance have emerged as a distinct market segment.

State filing fees are publicly available and vary by jurisdiction. EIN applications submitted directly to the IRS are free of cost, though some formation services charge separately for EIN procurement. Registered agent services, which are mandatory for all US LLCs, typically cost USD 50 to USD 200 per year.

Goldstein estimated that the annual cost of maintaining a US LLC - including registered agent fees, state annual filing requirements, Form 5472 preparation and basic accounting - ranges from approximately USD 1,000 to USD 3,000 per year, though costs vary significantly based on state of formation and complexity of the business.

Factors driving adoption Tax and business professionals point to several factors behind the trend, including limited access to global payment processors for Indian entities, currency conversion costs on cross-border transactions, and the perception that a US business entity provides greater credibility with international clients.

Goldstein said the core driver is payments infrastructure. Small Indian businesses exporting digital services face genuine friction in receiving international payments, and a US entity with a US bank account removes much of that friction.

However, he cautioned that the decision to form a US LLC should be based on a careful assessment of both the benefits and the full compliance costs across both jurisdictions. For individuals earning USD 1,000–2,000 a month from occasional international clients, the compliance costs alone may exceed the benefits, making the structure financially impractical.

Professional guidance recommended Tax and legal professionals have emphasised the importance of seeking qualified advice before forming foreign business entities. FEMA compliance, overseas investment reporting and cross-border tax obligations require case-specific assessment that cannot be adequately addressed through general online content, according to professionals in the field.

Tax professionals recommend that Indian residents considering a US LLC consult a chartered accountant with experience in international taxation and FEMA compliance before formation, rather than after, to ensure all obligations in both jurisdictions are understood from the outset.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice. US and Indian tax laws, FEMA regulations and state-level LLC requirements are subject to change. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making business formation or tax planning decisions.

(Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with NRDPL and PTI takes no editorial responsibility for the same.). PTI PWR

Topics

Acts Income Tax