London, Jul 1 (AP) British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won a key vote in Parliament Tuesday on his plans to trim welfare spending, but only after diluting the measures to ease intense opposition from within his own party.

In something of a hollow victory, the bill passed its first big House of Commons hurdle by 335 votes to 260 after the government appeased Labour Party rebels by softening and delaying cuts to welfare benefits for disabled people.

The result is a major blow to Starmer's authority as he approaches one year in office, reckoning with a sluggish economy and rock-bottom approval ratings.

It's a long way from the landslide election victory he won on July 4, 2024, when Starmer's centre-left Labour Party took 412 of the 650 seats in the House of Commons to end 14 years of Conservative government.

In the past 12 months, Starmer has navigated the rapids of a turbulent world, winning praise for rallying international support for Ukraine and persuading US President Donald Trump to sign a trade deal easing tariffs on UK goods.

But at home his agenda is on the rocks, as he struggles to convince British voters — and his own party — that his government is delivering the change that it promised.

John Curtice, a political scientist at the University of Strathclyde, said that Starmer has had “the worst start for any newly elected prime minister”.

Rebellion over welfare reform Reforming Britain's ballooning welfare system – and cutting the cost – is a key Starmer pledge, but an attempt to trim disability benefits caused consternation among Labour lawmakers.

Many balked at plans to raise the threshold for the payments by requiring a more severe physical or mental disability, a move the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimated would cut the income of 3.2 million people by 2030.

After more than 120 Labour lawmakers said they would vote against the bill — more than enough to defeat it — the government offered concessions, including a guarantee that no one currently getting benefits will be affected by the change.

But while some rebels backed down, others maintained their opposition, forcing the government to offer a further concession less than two hours before the Tuesday evening vote. Ministers pledged that changes to benefits would not be made until after a review, carried out with the help of disability groups.

That came after a string of Labour lawmakers spoke against the bill in Parliament. One, Rachel Maskell, called the cuts “Dickensian”.

“They are far from what this Labour Party is for: a party to protect the poor,” she said.

The welfare U-turn is the third time in a few weeks that the government has reversed course on a policy under pressure. In May, it dropped a plan to end winter home heating subsidies for millions of retirees. In June, Starmer announced a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something he was pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk.

“It's a failure of leadership for a prime minister with such a big majority to not be able to get their agenda through,” said Rob Ford, professor of politics at the University of Manchester.

Ford said the government had forgotten “the basic Lyndon Johnson principle of politics. First rule of politics: You need to know how to count.” The U-turns also make it harder for the government to find money to invest in public services without raising taxes.

The government estimated that its welfare reforms would save 5 billion pounds ($7 billion) a year from a welfare bill that has soared since the COVID-19 pandemic. After the concessions, it's unclear whether it will save any money at all.

Starmer acknowledges errors The government argues that it has achieved much in its first year: It has raised the minimum wage, strengthened workers' rights, launched new social housing projects and pumped money into the state-funded health system.

But inflation remains stubbornly high and economic growth low, frustrating efforts to ease the cost of living. Starmer's personal approval ratings are approaching those of Conservative Prime Minister Liz Truss, who lasted just 49 days in office in 2022 after her tax-cutting budget roiled the economy.

Starmer's government has raised taxes for employers and farmers, as well as squeezing benefits, blaming previous Conservative governments for the need to make tough choices. That downbeat argument has done little to make Starmer popular.

In recent days, Starmer has acknowledged mistakes. He told The Sunday Times that he was “heavily focused on what was happening with NATO and the Middle East,” while the welfare rebellion was brewing at home, and should have acted sooner to win over colleagues.

UK politics in flux Starmer's struggles are all the more striking, because the opposition Conservative Party had its worst-ever election result in 2024, reduced to only 121 lawmakers.

But UK politics is in unpredictable flux. A big chunk of Conservative support — and some of Labour's — shifted in this spring's local elections to Reform UK, a hard-right party led by veteran political pressure-cooker Nigel Farage.

Reform has just five legislators in the House of Commons, but regularly comes out on top in opinion polls. If the shift continues, it could end a century of dominance by the two big parties.

Starmer's key asset at the moment is time. He doesn't have to call an election until 2029.

“There's still plenty of time to turn things around,” Ford said. But he said that the Labour lawmakers' rebellion “will make things harder going forward, because it's not like this is the end of difficult decisions that he's going to have to make.

“Barring some magical unexpected economic boom... there's going to be a hell of a lot more fights to come,” he said. (AP) SCY SCY