TaxTMI Login
TaxTMI 
Login
Loading...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 3379 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of 3379 Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of 3379 Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of 3379 Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All News
of 3379 Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All News
Note
Bookmark
Share
Press Information Bureau
Government of India
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
13-August-2012 17:12 IST
Setting Up of Industries
Planning Commission set up an Inter-Ministerial Task Group for Redressal of Growing Regional Imbalances in August 2004. The Task Group identified 170 districts on 17 chosen parameters for backwardness including preponderance of agricultural labourers in the population, per capita credit-deposits, infrastructure and institutional facilities and percentage of Scheduled caste and Scheduled Tribe as overall proxy for regional backwardness. The Backward Regions Grant Fund (BRGF) was launched in August 2006. The programme covering 272 districts continued during the 11th Five Year Plan. As exercise is being undertaken to restructure BRGF including identification of backward areas for the 12th Five Year Plan. No study has been conducted to identify industrially backward region of the States for their development.
State-wise details of industries set up as reflected in Industrial Investment Intentions in terms of IEMs filed, Letters of Intent Issued and Direct Industrial Licence granted during the last three years in the country is at Annexure 1(A&B).
Details of financial Assistance provided under Central Capital Investment Subsidy scheme, Central Interest Subsidy Scheme and Central Comprehensive Insurance Scheme to the Special Category States of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh and Utarakhand are in Annexure 2. From 2002-03 to 2011-12, employment generated was 68,393 in Jammu & Kashmir, 1,05,452 in Himachal Pradesh and 3,18,890 in Utarakhand. Requests from other states have been received for similar packages, but it has been the consistent stand of the Government not to announce any fresh package in view of the fact that the above mentioned special category States have adverse geographical locations due to hilly and remote terrain and other specifications. There is no proposal to extend any such incentives to other States.
Annexure-1A
ANNEXURE 1A REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART(C) OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550 FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF INDUSTRIES’
STATEWISE AND YEARWISE BREAK UP OF INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT INTENTION IN TERMS OF IEMs FILED/LOIs/DILs ISSUED*
| NAME OF THE STATE | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012(JUNE) |
| Nos | Nos | Nos | Nos | |
| Andaman & Nicobar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 319 | 519 | 392 | 169 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
| Assam | 45 | 37 | 32 | 14 |
| Bihar | 32 | 46 | 31 | 12 |
| Chandigarh | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Chhattisgarh | 293 | 256 | 114 | 55 |
| Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 50 | 63 | 55 | 12 |
| Daman & Diu | 39 | 35 | 21 | 2 |
| Delhi | 21 | 19 | 12 | 1 |
| Goa | 46 | 39 | 23 | 12 |
| Gujarat | 376 | 497 | 544 | 254 |
| Haryana | 85 | 141 | 118 | 58 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 41 | 54 | 36 | 34 |
| Jammu & Kashmir | 23 | 23 | 21 | 19 |
| Jharkhand | 65 | 53 | 25 | 10 |
| Karnataka | 179 | 269 | 217 | 76 |
| Kerala | 8 | 8 | 12 | 3 |
| Lakshadweep | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 182 | 226 | 191 | 59 |
| Maharashtra | 594 | 759 | 975 | 275 |
| Manipur | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Meghalaya | 10 | 14 | 6 | 3 |
| Mizoram | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Nagaland | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Orissa | 99 | 179 | 119 | 36 |
| Pondicherry | 14 | 14 | 8 | 2 |
| Punjab | 68 | 103 | 113 | 42 |
| Rajasthan | 88 | 125 | 166 | 101 |
| Sikkim | 8 | 13 | 15 | 6 |
| Tamil Nadu | 236 | 237 | 258 | 104 |
| Tripura | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 176 | 172 | 165 | 63 |
| Uttaranchal | 165 | 217 | 80 | 27 |
| West Bengal | 206 | 209 | 136 | 44 |
| Location in more than One State | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Total | 3475 | 4336 | 3900 | 1498 |
*: IEMs: Industrial Entrepreneur Memoranda filed for delicensed sector falling under non MSME category LOIs: Letters of Intent issued; DILs: Direct Industrial Licences granted;
Annexure-1B
ANNEXURE 1B REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART(C) OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550 FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF INDUSTRIES’
| STATEWISE BREAK UP OF IEMs IMPLEMENTED BASED ON PART B OF IEM FORM FILED BY ENTREPRENEURS | ||||
|
| ||||
| Name of the State/UTs | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 (June) |
| Andaman & Nicobar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andhra Pradesh | 82 | 86 | 86 | 45 |
| Arunachal Pradesh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Assam | 10 | 9 | 13 | 10 |
| Bihar | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Chandigarh | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Chhattisgarh | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Dadra & Nagar Haveli | 9 | 7 | 6 | 3 |
| Daman & Diu | 3 | 13 | 1 | 1 |
| Delhi | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Goa | 5 | 6 | 7 | 2 |
| Gujarat | 76 | 56 | 50 | 27 |
| Haryana | 21 | 13 | 7 | 8 |
| Himachal Pradesh | 7 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
| Jammu &Kashmir | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Jharkhand | 0 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Karnataka | 31 | 19 | 22 | 3 |
| Kerala | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lakshadweep | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Madhya Pradesh | 30 | 12 | 11 | 9 |
| Maharashtra | 289 | 87 | 120 | 49 |
| Manipur | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Meghalaya | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Mizoram | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nagaland | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Orissa | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 |
| Puducherry | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 |
| Punjab | 16 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Rajasthan | 10 | 27 | 14 | 11 |
| Sikkim | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| Tamil Nadu | 39 | 27 | 28 | 7 |
| Tripura | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Uttar Pradesh | 18 | 24 | 20 | 11 |
| Uttarakhand | 68 | 159 | 31 | 34 |
| West Bengal | 68 | 50 | 33 | 18 |
| Total | 804 | 636 | 474 | 255 |
Annexure-2
ANNEXURE 2 REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO PART(d) TO (g) OF LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO 550 FOR ANSWER ON 13.8.2012 REGARDING ‘SETTING UP OF INDUSTRIES’
DETAILS OF THE FUND RELEASED UNDER THE SCHEME VIZ. “PACKAGE FOR SPECIAL CATEGORY STATES” (PLAN) SINCE ITS INCEPTION
(Rupees in crore)
| S.No | Name of the State | Scheme | 2002-03 | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 | 2006-07 | 2007-08 | 2008-09 | 2009-10 | 2010-11 | 2011-12 | Total |
| 1 | Jammu & Kashmir | Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme | NIL | 2.00 | NIL | NIL | NIL | 4.00 | NIL | NIL | 5.00 | 19.73 | 30.73 |
|
|
| Central Interest Subsidy Scheme | NIL | 1.75 | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 11.57 | 12.00 | 18.01 | 36.59 | 79.92 |
|
|
| Comprehensive Insurance Scheme | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | NIL | 0.13 | 3.27 | 3.40
|
|
|
| J&K Entrepreneurship Development Institute | NIL | NIL | 4.60 | NIL | NIL | NIL | 2.86 | NIL | 1.80 | 1.93 | 11.19 |
|
| Total |
| NIL | 3.75 | 4.60 | NIL | NIL | 4.00 | 14.43 | 12.00 | 24.94 | 61.52 | 125.24+ 50.00 (Equity Share)* |
| 2. | Himachal Pradesh | Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme | 2.50 | NIL | NIL | 7.00 | 12.00 | 20.00 | 22.57 | 19.00 | 29.84 | 101.37 | 214.28 |
|
| Total |
| 2.50 | NIL | NIL | 7.00 | 12.00 | 20.00 | 22.57 | 19.00 | 29.84 | 101.37 | 214.28
|
| 3. | Uttarakh-and | Central Capital Investment Subsidy Scheme | 2.50 | NIL | NIL | 7.00 | 9.00 | 5.00 | 23.00 | 18.50 | 10.22 | 75.51 | 150.73 |
|
| Total |
| 2.50 | NIL | NIL | 7.00 | 9.00 | 5.00 | 23.00 | 18.50 | 10.22 | 75.51 | 150.73
|
|
| Grand Total |
| 5.00 | 3.75 | 4.60 | 14.00 | 21.00 | 29.00 | 60.00 | 49.50 | 65.00 | 238.40 | 490.25 |
This information was given by the Minister of State for Commerce & Industry Shri Jyotiraditya M. Scindia in written reply to a question in Lok Sabha today.
DS/GK
