Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Section 44B read with Rule 6G
Section 140A read with Section 139(1)
Section 119 and Circular dated June 19, 1985
Relevant Dates
Due Date of filing of Return and audit report: 31st July 1985
Application filed seeking extension of time for filing of return
Audit Report obtained: 27th September 1985
Tax Deposited: 4th February 1986
Return filed: 7th March 1986
Based on the above facts, AO imposed penalty u/s 271B equal to Rs. 1,00,000/-.
Held that:
It is not in dispute that in terms of the circular dated June 19, 1985, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes which is binding upon all the authorities under section 119 of the Act, the respondent-assessee had obtained the audit report on September 27, 1985. The assessee had filed several applications from time to time seeking extension of time for filing the return up to March 31, 1986, and the return was filed on March 7, 1986, and the tax under section 140A of the Act was paid on February 4, 1986. This court in the case of CIT v. Jai Durga Construction Co. [2008 -TMI - 15036 - ALLAHABAD High Court], has held that penalty under section 271B of the Act was not imposable where the audit report has been obtained within the stipulated period. As in the present case, in view of the circular of the Board the audit report has been obtained on September 30, 1985, that would be sufficient compliance with section 44AB of the Act
Penalty not to be imposed.
For full text of judgment: