Loading...

⚠ ✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post a Query
Post a New Query ✕
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with ' ' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: ' ' ?

Discussion Forum

Back

All Issues

Advanced Search ❮
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
From To
Category :
OR
Search by Issue ID:
NOTE: If you have inputs in both the fields, then results will be shown for issueId first.
Issue ID: 121141
Like 1 Bookmark

Applicability of E-Way Bill in case of Inter-State Counter Sale

Date 25 Sep 2026
Replies 3 Replies
Views 496 Views
E-way bill responsibility follows the person causing goods movement, though views differ on mandatory compliance for counter sales.
Liability for e-way bill generation in an inter-State counter sale is linked to actual movement of goods and the person causing it, rather than the tax character of the supply alone. Where the buyer takes possession at the seller's premises and arranges transport, the buyer is treated as responsible under one view. A contrary view treats qualifying inter-State counter sales as requiring an e-way bill by the supplier or recipient. Absence of an e-way bill may attract procedural penalty, while general penalty discipline may be relevant where supply, tax payment, invoice, quantity, and ownership are undisputed. (AI Summary)

We are a registered dealer under GST. During the course of business, we made an inter-State counter sale of goods to a customer.The goods were sold directly from our business premises against a proper GST tax invoice. However, no e-Way Bill was generated at the time of the sale.

We seek expert views on the following:

  1. Whether an e-Way Bill is mandatory in the case of an inter-State counter sale, where the customer purchases the goods directly from the seller's premises?
  2. If the customer himself takes possession of the goods from the seller's premises and arranges/undertakes transportation to another State, who is legally responsible for generation of the e-Way Bill under Rule 138 of the CGST Rules?
  3. Whether the mere fact that the transaction is an inter-State supply makes an e-Way Bill mandatory, or whether the actual movement of goods and the person causing such movement is relevant?
  4. Where the seller has issued a valid tax invoice and correctly discharged IGST, but an e-Way Bill was not generated, can a penalty be imposed merely for this procedural lapse?
  5. Can the benefit of Section 126 of the CGST Act (general disciplines related to imposition of penalty) be claimed where there is no dispute regarding the underlying supply, tax payment, invoice, quantity or ownership of goods?
3 answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Sep 26, 2026
1.

In terms of Rule 138, an E-Way Bill is mandatory ofr interstate counter sales exceeding Rs. 50,000/- to be genearted by either the supplier or the recepient as the case may be.

In simple words, the person who causes the movement of consignment of goods is laible to create an E-Way Bill.

Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied on Sep 26, 2026
2.

Answers to your queries revolves around the phrase, "Who causes the movement of the goods ? " Nature of supply is not the determinant factor. The terms, "inter-State supply or intra-State supply " determines nature of tax i.e. IGST or CGST/SGST. Nature of supply is not criteria for E-way bill. The criteria for E-way bill is based on two factors and these are :

Movement of goods and who causes the movement of goods.

 

  1. Whether an e-Way Bill is mandatory in the case of an inter-State counter sale, where the customer purchases the goods directly from the seller's premises ?

 

  1. Ans. NO as explained above.

 

2. If the customer himself takes possession of the goods from the seller's premises and arranges/undertakes transportation to another State, who is legally responsible for generation of the e-Way Bill under Rule 138 of the CGST Rules?

2. Ans. The buyer because the ownership of the goods stands transferred at the door of the business premises (shop).

 

3. Whether the mere fact that the transaction is an inter-State supply makes an e-Way Bill mandatory, or whether the actual movement of goods and the person causing such movement is relevant ?

3. Ans. Actual movement of the goods and the person causing such movement are crucial.

 

4. Where the seller has issued a valid tax invoice and correctly discharged IGST, but an e-Way Bill was not generated, can a penalty be imposed merely for this procedural lapse ?

4. Ans. Penalty is imposable for procedural lapse but the case laws can help you in getting exoneration.

5. Can the benefit of Section 126 of the CGST Act (general disciplines related to imposition of penalty) be claimed where there is no dispute regarding the underlying supply, tax payment, invoice, quantity or ownership of goods ?

5. Ans. YES

Reply
Hide
Like 0
Replied at 7:07 AM
3.

In this case ideally the customer would issue the EWB since any non-compliance with this and if the vehicle in which the said goods are transported, is intercepted, the penalty will fall on the customer since it is his responsibility and interest to get the detained goods released.

Non-issuance of eway bill cannot lead to penalties after the goods have reached the destination.

Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Issues