Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Fairness and transparency in NRRA assignment under Regulation 37A require contextual application balancing competing interests; the tribunal found that fairness must account for the liquidator and secured creditor's position and did not view denial of consideration of a contemporaneous enhanced offer as patent unfairness where timelines and legitimate expectations of other stakeholders were engaged. Revised bids submitted after prescribed cut off and without required deposits need not be entertained to preserve finality; the appellant's belated, non compliant offer was therefore properly excluded. Acquiescence and waiver by conduct, and vested rights of a purchaser who acted on the sale absent fraud or collusion, bar post sale disturbance. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Fairness and transparency in NRRA assignment under Regulation 37A require contextual application balancing competing interests; the tribunal found that fairness must account for the liquidator and secured creditor's position and did not view denial of consideration of a contemporaneous enhanced offer as patent unfairness where timelines and legitimate expectations of other stakeholders were engaged. Revised bids submitted after prescribed cut off and without required deposits need not be entertained to preserve finality; the appellant's belated, non compliant offer was therefore properly excluded. Acquiescence and waiver by conduct, and vested rights of a purchaser who acted on the sale absent fraud or collusion, bar post sale disturbance. Outcome: appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.