Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the liquidator and Stakeholders' Consultation Committee were bound to consider the appellant's enhanced offer submitted after the stipulated bid timeline and after the successful bidder had been identified in the NRRA process.
Analysis: The assignment of a not readily realisable asset under Regulation 37A of the IBBI (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016 must be transparent and aimed at value maximisation, but those objectives operate within a fair process and cannot override duly fixed timelines or the legitimate interests of other participants. The appellant's revised offer was made after the cut-off date and after the bid process had substantially progressed, while the successful bidder had already been selected and acted upon. Entertaining a belated higher offer at that stage would unsettle the completed process, prejudice other bidders, and undermine the finality required in liquidation sales. The conduct of the appellant, including seeking refund of the EMD and approaching the Tribunal after considerable delay, also supported the conclusion that the process had been accepted when it concluded.
Conclusion: The enhanced offer was not required to be considered, and the challenge to the completed NRRA assignment failed.