Unlawful outward remittances via Hawala using proforma invoices and electronic records proved; documents admitted, directors penalised, penalties redu...
Attachment of equivalent-value properties as proceeds of crime upheld; preventive attachment order and confirmation sustained; no independent ED reinv...
Broker trading-system "technical glitch" redefinition and narrowed incident-reporting regime for large IBT/STWT brokers requiring 2-hr notice and 14-w...
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
