<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Limitation under Article 137 bars belated insolvency applications invoking guarantees; delayed Section 94 invocation dismissed as time barred.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96916</link>
    <description>Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants&#039; knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:56:50 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=886543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Limitation under Article 137 bars belated insolvency applications invoking guarantees; delayed Section 94 invocation dismissed as time barred.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96916</link>
      <description>Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants&#039; knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:56:50 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96916</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>