Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Effective service requirement: officers must explore alternative service modes beyond the GST portal and afford personal hearing; non-compliance voids...
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.