Tariff classification determines GST schedule and rate; beverages in Schedule III attract the higher rate, tea extracts and syrups in Schedule I attra...
Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Application under the Insolvency Code seeking initiation of insolvency via a guarantor was time barred under the Limitation Act: the tribunal applied the Article 137 three year limitation to applications under Section 94 and found that invocation of the guarantee in 2016-2017, after NPAs declared in 2013-2014, and the applicants' knowledge of potential insolvency filing rendered the 2023 filing barred. Pending debt recovery/security enforcement proceedings did not extend or exclude the limitation period sufficient to save the belated application, which was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
