Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
