<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Conversion of land to stock in trade and FMV adoption upheld as cost at conversion, appellate correction sustained against revenue</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96723</link>
    <description>Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:02:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:02:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=885191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Conversion of land to stock in trade and FMV adoption upheld as cost at conversion, appellate correction sustained against revenue</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96723</link>
      <description>Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2026 10:02:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>