Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
