Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Assessing Officer recalculated and adopted a fair market value for land at the time of its conversion into stock in trade but failed to apply that same value when computing business income and cost of acquisition, generating a mistake apparent on record. The appellate authority corrected this by treating the fair market value at conversion as the cost for subsequent business profit computation, deleting the addition. The tribunal found the appellate officer properly exercised appellate powers under the statute to rectify the evident error and upheld the appellate order, deciding against the revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
