Admission of additional evidence under remand rules must await a meaningful remand report; failure to do so breaches natural justice and mandates rema...
Export Obligation Discharge Certificates for EPCG compliance cannot be questioned by Customs unless DGFT adjudicates and cancels them, so demands quas...
Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed...
Change of corporate management after approved resolution plan - writ maintainable; property attachment not 'transfer' under PBPT; Section 32A protection
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed post-approval of a resolution plan: held that change in management via statutorily approved resolution alters the party composition such that the appellate tribunal cannot decide rights under Section 32A of the IBC; writ maintainable and not barred as parallel remedy - outcome: writ entertained. Whether attachment of property is a transfer under the PBPT Act: held no sale or transfer within Section 2(29) as only management changed under NCLT, so Section 57 inapplicable - outcome: benami provision not attracted. Whether benami status ousts IBC protection: held Section 32A embraces all corporate debtor property and benamidar holds subject property until governmental confiscation - outcome: attachment orders valid but cannot be acted upon in view of approved resolution. - HC
Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed post-approval of a resolution plan: held that change in management via statutorily approved resolution alters the party composition such that the appellate tribunal cannot decide rights under Section 32A of the IBC; writ maintainable and not barred as parallel remedy - outcome: writ entertained. Whether attachment of property is a transfer under the PBPT Act: held no sale or transfer within Section 2(29) as only management changed under NCLT, so Section 57 inapplicable - outcome: benami provision not attracted. Whether benami status ousts IBC protection: held Section 32A embraces all corporate debtor property and benamidar holds subject property until governmental confiscation - outcome: attachment orders valid but cannot be acted upon in view of approved resolution. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.