<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Change of corporate management after approved resolution plan - writ maintainable; property attachment not &#039;transfer&#039; under PBPT; Section 32A protection</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96118</link>
    <description>Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed post-approval of a resolution plan: held that change in management via statutorily approved resolution alters the party composition such that the appellate tribunal cannot decide rights under Section 32A of the IBC; writ maintainable and not barred as parallel remedy - outcome: writ entertained. Whether attachment of property is a transfer under the PBPT Act: held no sale or transfer within Section 2(29) as only management changed under NCLT, so Section 57 inapplicable - outcome: benami provision not attracted. Whether benami status ousts IBC protection: held Section 32A embraces all corporate debtor property and benamidar holds subject property until governmental confiscation - outcome: attachment orders valid but cannot be acted upon in view of approved resolution. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:51:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:51:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=879320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Change of corporate management after approved resolution plan - writ maintainable; property attachment not &#039;transfer&#039; under PBPT; Section 32A protection</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96118</link>
      <description>Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed post-approval of a resolution plan: held that change in management via statutorily approved resolution alters the party composition such that the appellate tribunal cannot decide rights under Section 32A of the IBC; writ maintainable and not barred as parallel remedy - outcome: writ entertained. Whether attachment of property is a transfer under the PBPT Act: held no sale or transfer within Section 2(29) as only management changed under NCLT, so Section 57 inapplicable - outcome: benami provision not attracted. Whether benami status ousts IBC protection: held Section 32A embraces all corporate debtor property and benamidar holds subject property until governmental confiscation - outcome: attachment orders valid but cannot be acted upon in view of approved resolution. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 11:51:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=96118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>