Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed...
Change of corporate management after approved resolution plan - writ maintainable; property attachment not 'transfer' under PBPT; Section 32A protection
📋
Contents
Cases Cited
Referred In
Notifications
Circulars
Forms
Manuals
Acts
Rules & Regulations
Case Laws New
Ref Provisions New
Plus +
Source NTF
Summary
Similar
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Whether a writ is maintainable where management changed post-approval of a resolution plan: held that change in management via statutorily approved resolution alters the party composition such that the appellate tribunal cannot decide rights under Section 32A of the IBC; writ maintainable and not barred as parallel remedy - outcome: writ entertained. Whether attachment of property is a transfer under the PBPT Act: held no sale or transfer within Section 2(29) as only management changed under NCLT, so Section 57 inapplicable - outcome: benami provision not attracted. Whether benami status ousts IBC protection: held Section 32A embraces all corporate debtor property and benamidar holds subject property until governmental confiscation - outcome: attachment orders valid but cannot be acted upon in view of approved resolution. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.