Section 115BBE classification requires a valid deeming-provision basis before special taxation, while the enhanced rate's temporal application remains...
Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Page of 4858
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 97155 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In a challenge concerning GST proceedings for delayed return filing, the court noted that no late fee under s.47 had been imposed, and held that if the confirmed tax demand had already been recovered and paid, no further pre-deposit would be required for the de novo proceedings arising from the impugned order dated 24.08.2024, and the assessee must file a reply to Form GST DRC-01 with supporting documents treating the impugned orders as an addendum to the show cause notice. The challenge to the assessment order was dismissed, while the remaining impugned orders were remanded subject to deposit of 50% of the disputed tax. - HC
In a challenge concerning GST proceedings for delayed return filing, the court noted that no late fee under s.47 had been imposed, and held that if the confirmed tax demand had already been recovered and paid, no further pre-deposit would be required for the de novo proceedings arising from the impugned order dated 24.08.2024, and the assessee must file a reply to Form GST DRC-01 with supporting documents treating the impugned orders as an addendum to the show cause notice. The challenge to the assessment order was dismissed, while the remaining impugned orders were remanded subject to deposit of 50% of the disputed tax. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
