Imported cement concessional duty exemption under Notification 4/2006 challenged over RSP misdeclaration; demand, interest and s.114A penalty set asid...
Body-worn camera recordings for Customs baggage checks: new SOP mandates full passenger-interaction capture, secure storage, privacy safeguards, stric...
HC upheld the Tribunal's finding that the non-resident assessee did not have a service PE in India under Art. 5(6) of the India-Singapore DTAA for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. It approved exclusion of 36 vacation days from the employees' 120-day physical presence, resulting in only 84 days in India, below the 90-day threshold. HC held that only actual days of service rendering in India are relevant and rejected the Revenue's contention of a "virtual service PE," noting that such a concept is absent from both the DTAA and the domestic statute. Appeals were dismissed against the Revenue.
HC upheld the Tribunal's finding that the non-resident assessee did not have a service PE in India under Art. 5(6) of the India-Singapore DTAA for AYs 2020-21 and 2021-22. It approved exclusion of 36 vacation days from the employees' 120-day physical presence, resulting in only 84 days in India, below the 90-day threshold. HC held that only actual days of service rendering in India are relevant and rejected the Revenue's contention of a "virtual service PE," noting that such a concept is absent from both the DTAA and the domestic statute. Appeals were dismissed against the Revenue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
