Co-operative society's mandatory reserve and share capital fixed deposits with banks-interest treated as business income under 80P(2)(a)(iii) deductio...
Income tax reassessment reopening after four years on investigation tip, without s.147 proviso disclosure failure, struck down as borrowed satisfactio...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
7761 to 7780 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that sales tax dues of the wound-up private company cannot presently be recovered from the petitioner-director under s.18 CST Act, as mandatory preconditions were not satisfied. While the company's winding up fulfilled the first statutory requirement, the respondent failed to establish or record any finding that non-recovery of dues was attributable to gross negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty by the petitioner in relation to the company's affairs. The petitioner's contention that he was a young student at the relevant time and not responsible for such defaults remained unrefuted. Given the lapse of over 20 years and non-compliance with s.18 procedures, the writ petition was allowed, with liberty to the respondent to lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator and proceed afresh under s.18 CST Act in accordance with law.
HC held that sales tax dues of the wound-up private company cannot presently be recovered from the petitioner-director under s.18 CST Act, as mandatory preconditions were not satisfied. While the company's winding up fulfilled the first statutory requirement, the respondent failed to establish or record any finding that non-recovery of dues was attributable to gross negligence, misfeasance, or breach of duty by the petitioner in relation to the company's affairs. The petitioner's contention that he was a young student at the relevant time and not responsible for such defaults remained unrefuted. Given the lapse of over 20 years and non-compliance with s.18 procedures, the writ petition was allowed, with liberty to the respondent to lodge its claim before the Official Liquidator and proceed afresh under s.18 CST Act in accordance with law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.