Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed that fees received for turnkey offshore supply and management services do not constitute "Fees for Technical Services" under the Act or the India-UK DTAA because the services did not "make available" technical knowledge or skills to the recipient; the services were managerial, annually renewable, and passed arm's-length scrutiny, so taxation as FTS was unwarranted. Relying on similarity of legal and factual matrix with a prior assessment year, ITAT also held there was no permanent establishment or dependent agent PE (PE/DAPE) in India. Both grounds were decided in favor of the taxpayer, overturning the assessing authority's imposition of Indian taxing rights.
ITAT affirmed that fees received for turnkey offshore supply and management services do not constitute "Fees for Technical Services" under the Act or the India-UK DTAA because the services did not "make available" technical knowledge or skills to the recipient; the services were managerial, annually renewable, and passed arm's-length scrutiny, so taxation as FTS was unwarranted. Relying on similarity of legal and factual matrix with a prior assessment year, ITAT also held there was no permanent establishment or dependent agent PE (PE/DAPE) in India. Both grounds were decided in favor of the taxpayer, overturning the assessing authority's imposition of Indian taxing rights.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.