Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT affirmed that fees received for turnkey offshore supply and management services do not constitute 'Fees for Technical Services' under the Act or the India-UK DTAA because the services did not 'make available' technical knowledge or skills to the recipient; the services were managerial, annually renewable, and passed arm's-length scrutiny, so taxation as FTS was unwarranted. Relying on similarity of legal and factual matrix with a prior assessment year, ITAT also held there was no permanent establishment or dependent agent PE (PE/DAPE) in India. Both grounds were decided in favor of the taxpayer, overturning the assessing authority's imposition of Indian taxing rights.