<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Turnkey offshore management fees not FTS under Sec.9(1)(v) and DTAA, so taxation avoided; no PE or DAPE.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94199</link>
    <description>ITAT affirmed that fees received for turnkey offshore supply and management services do not constitute &quot;Fees for Technical Services&quot; under the Act or the India-UK DTAA because the services did not &quot;make available&quot; technical knowledge or skills to the recipient; the services were managerial, annually renewable, and passed arm&#039;s-length scrutiny, so taxation as FTS was unwarranted. Relying on similarity of legal and factual matrix with a prior assessment year, ITAT also held there was no permanent establishment or dependent agent PE (PE/DAPE) in India. Both grounds were decided in favor of the taxpayer, overturning the assessing authority&#039;s imposition of Indian taxing rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864806" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Turnkey offshore management fees not FTS under Sec.9(1)(v) and DTAA, so taxation avoided; no PE or DAPE.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94199</link>
      <description>ITAT affirmed that fees received for turnkey offshore supply and management services do not constitute &quot;Fees for Technical Services&quot; under the Act or the India-UK DTAA because the services did not &quot;make available&quot; technical knowledge or skills to the recipient; the services were managerial, annually renewable, and passed arm&#039;s-length scrutiny, so taxation as FTS was unwarranted. Relying on similarity of legal and factual matrix with a prior assessment year, ITAT also held there was no permanent establishment or dependent agent PE (PE/DAPE) in India. Both grounds were decided in favor of the taxpayer, overturning the assessing authority&#039;s imposition of Indian taxing rights.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 07:56:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>