Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9201 to 9220 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
