Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
ITAT affirmed the assessment: the AO's computation of business income at 8% of turnover under section 44AD was sustained, with CIT(A)'s concurrence upheld as a correct finding. Separately, additions relating to acquisition of an immovable asset were also upheld because the assessee failed to discharge the initial onus to establish receipts from relatives-no satisfactory identity, PAN/return evidence, bank statements evidencing receipt/debit, confirmation, repayment records or proof of creditworthiness were furnished. Consequently, the unexplained investment was disallowed and the assessee's appeal was dismissed in its entirety.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
