Appellate enhancement limits protect against new income sources, while documented credits and prior-year investments resist unexplained-income additio...
Capital-gains exemption for charitable trusts extends to qualifying fixed deposits, while unrecoverable TDS write-offs may constitute income applicati...
Page of 4868
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 97344 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 as non-maintainable and time-barred. The petitioner challenged an inspection conducted on 24.02.2023 and an Order-in-Original dated 19.11.2024, but failed to prefer the statutory appeal within the three-month period prescribed by Section 107(1) and did not establish sufficient cause to invoke Section 107(4). The Court held that factual disputes and an appealable order preclude writ relief where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; the writ court will not function as an appellate forum. Having found no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no basis to disturb the impugned order, the petition was disposed of.
The HC dismissed the writ petition under Article 226 as non-maintainable and time-barred. The petitioner challenged an inspection conducted on 24.02.2023 and an Order-in-Original dated 19.11.2024, but failed to prefer the statutory appeal within the three-month period prescribed by Section 107(1) and did not establish sufficient cause to invoke Section 107(4). The Court held that factual disputes and an appealable order preclude writ relief where an effective statutory appellate remedy exists; the writ court will not function as an appellate forum. Having found no satisfactory explanation for the delay and no basis to disturb the impugned order, the petition was disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
