Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.