Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
The HC held that the impugned final assessment order under s.143(3) read with s.144B, the demand notice under s.156 and the penalty notice under s.274 read with s.217AAC for AY 2022-23 were vitiated by a gross violation of natural justice where the respondent afforded the assessee less than three days to file a reply. The court found a breach of the audi alteram partem principle (including the rule against bias) and concluded the petitioner was not heard before passing the assessment. The HC quashed and set aside the impugned orders and allowed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
