Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
A high court upheld a single-judge interim order staying a state notification that appointed a commission of inquiry into whether a federal investigatory agency sought to implicate the state's chief executive in a gold-smuggling matter. The bench dismissed the state's appeal, affirmed the stay, and noted the single judge will decide later whether the state had legislative competence to appoint the commission. The stay was grounded on preventing parallel proceedings and interference with ongoing criminal prosecutions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and on the principle that a commission is a fact-finding, not adjudicatory, body.
A high court upheld a single-judge interim order staying a state notification that appointed a commission of inquiry into whether a federal investigatory agency sought to implicate the state's chief executive in a gold-smuggling matter. The bench dismissed the state's appeal, affirmed the stay, and noted the single judge will decide later whether the state had legislative competence to appoint the commission. The stay was grounded on preventing parallel proceedings and interference with ongoing criminal prosecutions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and on the principle that a commission is a fact-finding, not adjudicatory, body.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.