Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
A high court upheld a single-judge interim order staying a state notification that appointed a commission of inquiry into whether a federal investigatory agency sought to implicate the state's chief executive in a gold-smuggling matter. The bench dismissed the state's appeal, affirmed the stay, and noted the single judge will decide later whether the state had legislative competence to appoint the commission. The stay was grounded on preventing parallel proceedings and interference with ongoing criminal prosecutions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and on the principle that a commission is a fact-finding, not adjudicatory, body.
A high court upheld a single-judge interim order staying a state notification that appointed a commission of inquiry into whether a federal investigatory agency sought to implicate the state's chief executive in a gold-smuggling matter. The bench dismissed the state's appeal, affirmed the stay, and noted the single judge will decide later whether the state had legislative competence to appoint the commission. The stay was grounded on preventing parallel proceedings and interference with ongoing criminal prosecutions under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, and on the principle that a commission is a fact-finding, not adjudicatory, body.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.