Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT directed exclusion from the comparability set of several large group-affiliated IT service providers on the ground that their substantial turnover, brand-derived intangibles and resultant economies of scale render them non-comparable with the tested party; the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of two specified comparables as functionally comparable, rejecting the assessee's contention that profit volatility or lack of segmental disclosure justified exclusion absent demonstration of extraordinary events; the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's attempt to import companies not appearing in the TPO's search matrix as impermissible cherry-picking; and remitted the issue of working-capital adjustment to the TPO for fresh consideration and computation after hearing.
ITAT directed exclusion from the comparability set of several large group-affiliated IT service providers on the ground that their substantial turnover, brand-derived intangibles and resultant economies of scale render them non-comparable with the tested party; the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of two specified comparables as functionally comparable, rejecting the assessee's contention that profit volatility or lack of segmental disclosure justified exclusion absent demonstration of extraordinary events; the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's attempt to import companies not appearing in the TPO's search matrix as impermissible cherry-picking; and remitted the issue of working-capital adjustment to the TPO for fresh consideration and computation after hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.