<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Ruling excludes large group IT service providers as non-comparable; upholds two comparables, rejects cherry-picking, remits working-capital adjustment</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92464</link>
    <description>ITAT directed exclusion from the comparability set of several large group-affiliated IT service providers on the ground that their substantial turnover, brand-derived intangibles and resultant economies of scale render them non-comparable with the tested party; the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of two specified comparables as functionally comparable, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention that profit volatility or lack of segmental disclosure justified exclusion absent demonstration of extraordinary events; the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s attempt to import companies not appearing in the TPO&#039;s search matrix as impermissible cherry-picking; and remitted the issue of working-capital adjustment to the TPO for fresh consideration and computation after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:48:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:48:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=850018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Ruling excludes large group IT service providers as non-comparable; upholds two comparables, rejects cherry-picking, remits working-capital adjustment</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92464</link>
      <description>ITAT directed exclusion from the comparability set of several large group-affiliated IT service providers on the ground that their substantial turnover, brand-derived intangibles and resultant economies of scale render them non-comparable with the tested party; the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of two specified comparables as functionally comparable, rejecting the assessee&#039;s contention that profit volatility or lack of segmental disclosure justified exclusion absent demonstration of extraordinary events; the Tribunal dismissed the assessee&#039;s attempt to import companies not appearing in the TPO&#039;s search matrix as impermissible cherry-picking; and remitted the issue of working-capital adjustment to the TPO for fresh consideration and computation after hearing.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 08:48:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92464</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>