Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Ruling excludes large group IT service providers as non-comparable; upholds two comparables, rejects cherry-picking, remits working-capital adjustment

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT directed exclusion from the comparability set of several large group-affiliated IT service providers on the ground that their substantial turnover, brand-derived intangibles and resultant economies of scale render them non-comparable with the tested party; the Tribunal upheld the inclusion of two specified comparables as functionally comparable, rejecting the assessee's contention that profit volatility or lack of segmental disclosure justified exclusion absent demonstration of extraordinary events; the Tribunal dismissed the assessee's attempt to import companies not appearing in the TPO's search matrix as impermissible cherry-picking; and remitted the issue of working-capital adjustment to the TPO for fresh consideration and computation after hearing.....