Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT allowed an appeal and set aside the ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 that had admitted a Section 95 IBC application and initiated CIRP proceedings against two personal guarantors (spouses). The Tribunal found procedural unfairness and violation of principles of natural justice because the guarantors had not filed a reply to the RP's report and were not shown to have deliberately absented or unduly delayed proceedings. NCLAT held that requiring oral submissions on merits at that stage was unwarranted, recalled the impugned orders, and disposed of the appeal, thereby restoring procedural equity and directing further adjudication consistent with fair hearing.
NCLAT allowed an appeal and set aside the ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 that had admitted a Section 95 IBC application and initiated CIRP proceedings against two personal guarantors (spouses). The Tribunal found procedural unfairness and violation of principles of natural justice because the guarantors had not filed a reply to the RP's report and were not shown to have deliberately absented or unduly delayed proceedings. NCLAT held that requiring oral submissions on merits at that stage was unwarranted, recalled the impugned orders, and disposed of the appeal, thereby restoring procedural equity and directing further adjudication consistent with fair hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
