Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Appeal allowed; ex parte Section 95 IBC orders admitting CIRP against personal guarantors set aside for procedural unfairness

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....NCLAT allowed an appeal and set aside the ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 that had admitted a Section 95 IBC application and initiated CIRP proceedings against two personal guarantors (spouses). The Tribunal found procedural unfairness and violation of principles of natural justice because the guarantors had not filed a reply to the RP's report and were not shown to have deliberately absented or unduly delayed proceedings. NCLAT held that requiring oral submissions on merits at that stage was unwarranted, recalled the impugned orders, and disposed of the appeal, thereby restoring procedural equity and directing further adjudication consistent with fair hearing.....