Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
NCLAT allowed an appeal and set aside the ex parte orders dated 06.12.2024 and 09.12.2024 that had admitted a Section 95 IBC application and initiated CIRP proceedings against two personal guarantors (spouses). The Tribunal found procedural unfairness and violation of principles of natural justice because the guarantors had not filed a reply to the RP's report and were not shown to have deliberately absented or unduly delayed proceedings. NCLAT held that requiring oral submissions on merits at that stage was unwarranted, recalled the impugned orders, and disposed of the appeal, thereby restoring procedural equity and directing further adjudication consistent with fair hearing.