Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC dismissed the appeal filed by the CHA against the CESTAT order, which held the CHA responsible for gross misdeclaration of goods described as specialized masonry blocks but found to be rotten cement bricks. The appellant sought to withdraw their vakalatnama due to lack of proper instructions. The Court found no substantial question of law warranting interference and upheld the CESTAT's determination of misdeclaration liability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The HC dismissed the appeal filed by the CHA against the CESTAT order, which held the CHA responsible for gross misdeclaration of goods described as specialized masonry blocks but found to be rotten cement bricks. The appellant sought to withdraw their vakalatnama due to lack of proper instructions. The Court found no substantial question of law warranting interference and upheld the CESTAT's determination of misdeclaration liability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
