Appeal dismissed under Section 35F: CHA held liable for gross misdeclaration of goods as rotten cement bricks

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The HC dismissed the appeal filed by the CHA against the CESTAT order, which held the CHA responsible for gross misdeclaration of goods described as specialized masonry blocks but found to be rotten cement bricks. The appellant sought to withdraw their vakalatnama due to lack of proper instructions. The Court found no substantial question of law warranting interference and upheld the CESTAT's determination of misdeclaration liability. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.....