Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC granted interim bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA, specifically invoking the first proviso to Section 45, which permits bail when the accused is seriously ill with a life-threatening condition requiring specialized treatment unavailable in jail hospitals. The Court found that the petitioner's medical condition warranted surgical intervention and that the petitioner was being inadequately treated while in custody. Balancing the gravity of the economic offenses with the petitioner's health needs, the Court exercised discretion to allow interim bail, subject to the petitioner's undertaking not to leave Gurugram jurisdiction during the bail period. Consequently, the bail application was allowed to facilitate appropriate medical care in a hospital of the petitioner's choice.
The HC granted interim bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA, specifically invoking the first proviso to Section 45, which permits bail when the accused is seriously ill with a life-threatening condition requiring specialized treatment unavailable in jail hospitals. The Court found that the petitioner's medical condition warranted surgical intervention and that the petitioner was being inadequately treated while in custody. Balancing the gravity of the economic offenses with the petitioner's health needs, the Court exercised discretion to allow interim bail, subject to the petitioner's undertaking not to leave Gurugram jurisdiction during the bail period. Consequently, the bail application was allowed to facilitate appropriate medical care in a hospital of the petitioner's choice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.