Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, facing custody under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, was entitled to interim bail on medical grounds under the first proviso to Section 45 of that Act.
Analysis: The statutory bar under Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 was treated as the governing rule, with the first proviso carving out an exception for a person who is sick or infirm. The relevant standard was whether the ailment was serious, life-endangering, and incapable of adequate treatment in custody or in jail hospital, and whether specialised medical intervention was required. On the facts, the medical record disclosed persistent elbow injury, repeated referrals, high-risk status for surgery, and a need for treatment in a specialised hospital. The Court also accepted that the petitioner had not received stable and effective treatment despite multiple hospital admissions and that the prevailing medical condition justified temporary release for surgery.
Conclusion: The petitioner satisfied the requirement of being sick or infirm for the purpose of the first proviso to Section 45, and interim bail was granted for undergoing surgery.
Final Conclusion: Temporary release was justified on medical and humanitarian grounds, and the petitioner was directed to surrender after the limited interim period on terms fixed by the Court.
Ratio Decidendi: Interim bail under the medical exception to Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 may be granted where the accused's condition is shown to be sufficiently serious, requires specialised treatment, and cannot be adequately managed in custody.