<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Interim Bail Granted Under Section 45 PMLA for Seriously Ill Accused Needing Specialized Medical Care</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90397</link>
    <description>The HC granted interim bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA, specifically invoking the first proviso to Section 45, which permits bail when the accused is seriously ill with a life-threatening condition requiring specialized treatment unavailable in jail hospitals. The Court found that the petitioner&#039;s medical condition warranted surgical intervention and that the petitioner was being inadequately treated while in custody. Balancing the gravity of the economic offenses with the petitioner&#039;s health needs, the Court exercised discretion to allow interim bail, subject to the petitioner&#039;s undertaking not to leave Gurugram jurisdiction during the bail period. Consequently, the bail application was allowed to facilitate appropriate medical care in a hospital of the petitioner&#039;s choice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:41:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:41:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=835591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Interim Bail Granted Under Section 45 PMLA for Seriously Ill Accused Needing Specialized Medical Care</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90397</link>
      <description>The HC granted interim bail to the petitioner accused under PMLA, specifically invoking the first proviso to Section 45, which permits bail when the accused is seriously ill with a life-threatening condition requiring specialized treatment unavailable in jail hospitals. The Court found that the petitioner&#039;s medical condition warranted surgical intervention and that the petitioner was being inadequately treated while in custody. Balancing the gravity of the economic offenses with the petitioner&#039;s health needs, the Court exercised discretion to allow interim bail, subject to the petitioner&#039;s undertaking not to leave Gurugram jurisdiction during the bail period. Consequently, the bail application was allowed to facilitate appropriate medical care in a hospital of the petitioner&#039;s choice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 08:41:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=90397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>