Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT determined a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) involving inter-corporate loans/advances between related companies. The tribunal distinguished between loan and deposit transactions, emphasizing essential legal characteristics. Critically, the assessee failed to provide substantive evidence supporting the transaction's nature as an inter-corporate deposit (ICD). Key findings included absence of interest expense documentation, lack of tax deducted at source (TDS) details, and no comprehensive repayment records. The transaction's routing through an intermediary company raised significant credibility concerns. Ultimately, the tribunal concluded the advance primarily benefited the assessee's investment, thereby dismissing the appeal and confirming the deemed dividend treatment.
ITAT determined a deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) involving inter-corporate loans/advances between related companies. The tribunal distinguished between loan and deposit transactions, emphasizing essential legal characteristics. Critically, the assessee failed to provide substantive evidence supporting the transaction's nature as an inter-corporate deposit (ICD). Key findings included absence of interest expense documentation, lack of tax deducted at source (TDS) details, and no comprehensive repayment records. The transaction's routing through an intermediary company raised significant credibility concerns. Ultimately, the tribunal concluded the advance primarily benefited the assessee's investment, thereby dismissing the appeal and confirming the deemed dividend treatment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.