Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant's involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
The AT affirmed the Provisional Attachment Order (PAO) in a money laundering case involving illegal wildlife trade and ivory trafficking. The tribunal held that properties acquired prior to the criminal offense can be attached when proceeds of crime are unavailable or partially traceable. In this instance, the appellant's involvement was established through ivory recovery, statements under Section 50 of PMLA, 2002, and prima facie evidence of criminal proceeds exceeding Rs. 120 lakhs. The tribunal concluded that the appellant was guilty under Section 3 of PMLA, 2002, and confirmed the attachment of equivalent property value. The appeal was consequently dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
