Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.
AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
