<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs exemption for inputs/parts used in making phone display assemblies, even if scrapped.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85065</link>
    <description>AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=790849" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs exemption for inputs/parts used in making phone display assemblies, even if scrapped.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85065</link>
      <description>AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 08:21:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=85065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>