Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.
AAR held that the benefit of exemption under Sl. No. 5D(b) of Notification No. 57/2017-Customs shall be available for import of inputs or parts intended for use in manufacturing display assemblies for cellular mobile phones, even if some inputs/parts get scrapped during the manufacturing process. The exemption applies to inputs/parts imported for the intended use of manufacturing display assemblies, irrespective of whether they ultimately form part of the finished product or get damaged/scrapped. The AAR rejected the contention that the advance ruling application was ineligible u/s 28E(b) of the Customs Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
