Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC's order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order over the proceeds of crime. Despite the lapse of 180 days u/s 5(3) of PMLA, the period from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 was excluded due to Covid-19 as per the SC's order. The property, though purchased by a non-accused entity, could be attached as it constituted proceeds of crime transferred by the accused. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the attachment orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.